SIDELINED OR MURDERED: The Truth about U.S. Counterintelligence agents and their espionage against President Trump

Introduction by Marielena Montesino de Stuart

President Donald Trump is turning the international globalist communist agenda on its head. That’s right. A communist agenda. As such, Trump is a threat to all who have been actively destroying this country with their communist timetables, while lining their pockets. This includes fellow travelers who claim to be “conservatives”– and are part of the farcical groups who tried to stop Trump (and are still trying) in the name of “conservatism. ” Do not accept their excuses. Our national security is at stake– and our lives are at risk.

Very few analysts can decipher and expose the truth about the current explosion of treason in Washington DC like my colleague JR Nyquist. What follows will open your eyes about the treasonous U.S. counterintelligence agents and their espionage against President Trump– and will eliminate the noise and confusion created by communists in the media.

JR Nyquist has the cojones to say the truth.

Marielena Montesino de Stuart
Someone has to say the truth…
February 22, 2017

Reprinted with permission from JR Nyquist

Golitsyn’s Methodology
and the Trump Administration
Commentary for 20 February 2017

"The new methodology provides explanations for many contradictions and anomalies in the communist world on which the old methodology throws no light. It explains the confidence of the communist world and the loyalty and dedication of the vast majority of its officials. It explains the reasons for disclosures of information by the communist world about itself and relates them to the requirements of long-range policy. It explains the seeming tolerance of a totalitarian system toward dissension openly expressed by its citizens in their contacts with foreigners. It provides criteria for assessing the reliability of sources, for distinguishing genuine secret agents and defectors from provocateurs, for distinguishing genuine information from disinformation and propaganda. It provides pointers to the identification of agents of influence in the West. It suggests that disinformation, recognized as such, can provide clues to the intentions of its authors. It offers guidance on the relative importance of the official and unofficial communist sources. It diverts attention from spectacular communist polemics between parties and focuses it instead on the solid advances in the groundwork of communist cooperation and coordination. It points the way to recovery from the crisis in Western studies and assessments of communism. It could help to revive the effectiveness of Western security and intelligence services. It explains the communist victory in the Vietnam War despite the Sino-Soviet split. Above all, it explains the willingness and ability of the communist world, despite the appearance of disunity, to seize the initiative and to develop and execute its strategies in relation to the United States, the other advanced industrial countries, and the Third World in the quest for the complete and final victory of international communism."

-Anatoliy Golitsyn, New Lies for Old, p. 102

What would Anatoliy Golitsyn, the KGB defector who correctly anticipated the fake collapse of communism, say about the Trump administration? I believe he would say that the communist strategists have launched a new provocation based upon a supposed split between the communist-dominated U.S. Democratic Party and (Soviet) Russia.

This supposed split offers some tantalizing tactical advantages to the communist side. It diverts attention from the extensive and treasonous collaboration of the American Left with Russia and the communist bloc. It also helps to camouflage future collaboration on the part of Trump’s critics. (People who warn of Russian interference with the elections will not be scrutinized too carefully themselves in this regard, especially by a media that is packed with communist operatives). To say that Trump is a Russian puppet diverts attention from the fact that those leveling the accusation have served Russia and the communist cause for many years. It weakens the authority of a president who has promised to reverse the many policies of national self-negation which have been the mainstay of the Democratic Party, and the watchword of the Republican establishment.

Meanwhile, Barack Obama continues to relay commands to his leftist cadres within the U.S. Federal Government. This is why he stayed in Washington. For all intents and purposes, he is still president; that is, he is the commander-in-chief for the communists in Washington. Their conspiracy continues, as ever, toward the “inevitable” convergence of capitalism with communism (on communist terms).

It is important (from the communist point of view) that nobody guess the actual situation, that nobody see how far the subversion has gone, or how powerful the communist side has become within the state. While Obama was U.S. President an identical circumstance played out in Washington as in Moscow. In both capitals the communists were depicted as an inconsiderable and irrelevant minority. In reality, the presidents of both countries were committed communists. The levers of power were in their hands, and the world suspected nothing. While Obama worked to disarm the United States, Putin worked to rearm Russia. While Obama undercut our allies abroad, Putin invaded Crimea and intervened in the Middle East. As the danger grew, as Hillary Clinton was sure to be the next and final president, the collaboration between Washington and Moscow was guaranteed to result in America’s defeat.

But then a miracle happened. Donald Trump was elected president; a man of impeccable nationalist instinct, of remarkable courage in the face of the enemy. The communists were aghast at his victory. And so, strange as it seems, they decided on a preposterous fraud. While they posed as Russia’s enemies, Donald Trump would be depicted as Russia’s friend.

For the leading communists to deny their communist affiliation was a preliminary strategic step in both Washington and Moscow. Freed from the label of what they had actually been, the communists were able to advance without opposition from those annoying anti-communists. And now they are compelled by the logic of their false position to paint the “patriotic American dinosaur” (Donald Trump) as Russia’s puppet. Here the real puppet points to the man and declares that he is the puppet. It is a history-making deception. It is grand and it is bold. It cynically estimates the ignorance of the populace, the corruption of the political class, and the willing treachery of the media. It relies on the fact that the smartest strategists and analysts on the American side have been sidelined or murdered. So there is nobody to call out the truth.

Who now dares say the truth about what has happened in this country? Anyone writing in this vein is committing career suicide. Therefore, only someone without a career would dare to write along these lines at all! Even then it means being assigned to a death list, like Anna Politkovskaya and Alexander Litvinenko. (You want a successful career? You want to live? Sing the tune that is assigned. Play a role out of the communist script. You can be a conservative if you wish, but you will be Moscow’s conservative.)

Of course, you probably think I am crazy. You think communism went away in 1991. You think that communism no longer exists. But then you will have to explain how we got here – with communist thugs using open intimidation on the streets of our cities! If communism lost the Cold War, why does it presently hold such power in government agencies, universities and newspapers? Why do you think U.S. counterintelligence is spying on the President of the United States and his staff? Who wants to bring him down? You need to explain all the variable phenomena of today: from the communist-inspired economic sabotage of global warming “science” to the insistence that our border remain a sieve. It is only our enemies who stand to gain from these policies.

But communism is dead. Nobody believes in it anymore. We are told that the last true believer in communism was Stalin’s protégé and USSR Communist Party Ideology Chief Mikhail Suslov. Gorbachev and Yeltsin, and other top Soviet officials, made a show of abandoning communism. But I tell you it was only a show. Former KGB officer Anatoliy Golitsyn insisted that all communist sources of information are larded with falsehood; that communist officials publicly and privately make misleading statements about themselves, their thoughts and their intentions.

What do we actually know about the thinking of Mikhail Suslov or Mikhail Gorbachev (for that matter)? We only know what Communist Party officials say is true – about themselves and their party. And communists lie! There is also a more subtle point, which may seem contradictory, but is fundamental at the non-ideological level: It is irrelevant what Suslov or Gorbachev believed. Their personal beliefs would be decisive only if Marxism had been a mere belief system, if it represented a stable set of principles; but Marx himself did not believe in Marxism. He laughed at people who believed in it. Why would it matter if Suslov also did not believe?

What is decisive to understand about Marxism is its ever-shifting role as a rationale for a new kind of power. What is important here is not the particulars of the rationale itself, but the spirit which calls forth the rationale in the first place. If we want to understand how the great totalitarian machine is able to morph and shift and change with the times, we must go to its soul. At bottom Marxism is a strategy behind which stands a pathological desire for absolute power and global destruction. The outward phenomenon of Marxism is merely the intellectual camouflage of the politically self-actualized psychopath. Here is the outward expression of his rationalization for murder, for seizing power. This outward expression has changed time and time again, but its spiritual essence is always the same. And we always seem to miss the point of it. We always seem to address the inner thoughts and intentions of people who are assumed to believe or not believe in a set of “principles.” But this is an error. We do not understand these people at all! The communist does not take ideas seriously. He is serious only about power and strategy.

A mask is not an idea. A strategy is not a principle. These are tools, weapons, methods. Marx did not believe in his tools. He used them, and his followers used them, until the tools of the hour no longer served their purpose. Then the old tools, the old weapons, were discarded for a new set of weapons – “new lies for old.” Those who talk about belief or disbelief are only talking about the superficial shell of the thing, which can be replaced with a new shell – a new outward appearance. If Marx did not believe in Marxism, then the true Marxist should not believe in it either. It is a sorry swindler who believes in his own swindle. Behind the shell of the communist’s outward pretenses we find the same core phenomenon: the malevolent soul of the destroyer, the envious lusting for power and revenge, the hatred of the good for being the good. And in this soul’s self-affirmation we find, curiously, a reformulation of the same old totalitarian themes; the same old bag of tricks for debasing and leveling humanity. All that being said, the outward shell of the supposedly debunked Marxism is by no means out of the game. Out-and-out communism could return to power at any time. The various outer shells – the rationales and swindles – may change and shift as circumstances require; yet the driving force from within remains ever constant, ever alert to new opportunities. Marxism is strategy, not belief. That is why Mao Zedong said, “Marxism is better than a machine gun.” One does not believe in a machine gun. One uses it, merely, to neutralize an enemy. One must keep in mind the usefulness, in this regard, of ideological mortars and howitzers and atomic bombs – the whole arsenal of political correctness.

But you cannot get over this idea; namely, that communism is dead. You saw it die on TV. How can we talk once again about Marxism-Leninism? Or as an Estonian presidential candidate once asked in response to my discourse: “What’s Marxism-Leninism?” His pained expression relayed the idea that Marxism-Leninism was something that didn’t really exist. Nobody believed in it, so why did it matter? Even the communists don’t believe in communism anymore. It’s as simple as that! Any idiot who tells you that there are true-believing communists should wear a dunce cap. Russia a democracy. China is capitalist. Cuba is an open society with superb health care. And that nice little North Korean man is a champion of world peace!

It is merely one more ridiculous proposition out of many. In fact, it is the final ridiculous proposition. It is the proposition that crushes man’s soul. To say that communism doesn’t exist is to surrender. It means giving up your country to the communists who don’t exist. Remember the Ministry of Truth from George Orwell’s 1984? It was a ministry that dispensed nothing but lies. Now imagine if the Ministry of Truth disbanded itself and admitted to lying. “We are turning over a new leaf,” says the Ministry of Truth. “We are now the Ministry of the Real Truth.” Oh, it’s such a relief! Finally, we can believe in them! Marxism-Leninism is gone and the Marxist-Leninists are now honest! If they say we won the Cold war, we won the Cold War. In a world where nonsense is often believed, why would this nonsense not be accepted as the New Gospel (according to Saint Gorbachev)? The hammer and sickle comes down, the tricolor goes up. How could you question that? It’s like being against chocolate!

So where did all the communists go? Did they simply revert to Christianity? Did they become Scientologists? Stop and think for a moment. You control half the planet and you’ve been fooling people in every country for decades. And what do you do for an encore? You fall off the edge of the flat earth! Well, I guess they topped themselves after all. And then, twenty-five years later, suddenly, you discover they have taken over your child’s mind and sent him into the street to beat up an old displaced factory worker wearing a hat which says, “Make America Great Again.” You have the CIA and FBI spying on the President of the United States to the advantage of change agents. And Congress is dragging its feet on Trump’s cabinet nominees because they’ve been honey-trapped by the Satanic Pedophile communist zombie apocalypse. It is real Satanism, real pedophilia, real undead communists, and a real apocalypse.

Have you ever seen the movie Invasion of the Body Snatchers? It’s an allegorical fiction about a communist takeover. Well, we’re living it. In fact, the pod people are attempting to convince the world that they are the ones fighting the alien invasion! This lie is repeated on every news channel. And you might easily believe them: First, because you did not understand who the enemy was. Second, because you don’t believe in pod people. Third, because you voted pod people into the White House in 1992, 1996, 2008 and 2012. And when the pod people finally colonized your government and rotted out your nuclear arsenal, the old pod president didn’t go back to Illinois. He remained in Washington to command the pod-people army inside the federal government, while Mr. Trump erroneously believes himself to be in charge.

So they don’t believe in Marxism-Leninism anymore? So why do we have socialized medicine? And why does Vladimir Lenin, who died in 1924, lie calmly with his eyes closed in his mausoleum on Red Square – not buried in a grave with a stone marker? No doubt, he is kept on display in Moscow because “nobody there believes in him anymore”! It’s a funny kind of not-believing in someone, don’t you think?

Nobody in Moscow believes in communism! They refuse to bury Lenin because he makes a nice tourist attraction. And besides, Vladimir Putin wears a cross and says he believes in God. (Well, he doesn’t really like to talk about it. But we think he believes in God.) And so, at the end of the day, we are all Kremlin puppets. We are all bouncing helplessly at the end of Moscow’s string. Even now the puppet-master appears to be at odds with his most secret creatures – the moles at CIA and FBI! Appearances notwithstanding, the puppeteer must always hide the puppet’s strings. This he accomplishes by a diversion in which he calls the man (Trump) a puppet and the puppet (Obama) he calls a man. And so, as well, he calls his friend enemy and his enemy he calls friend.

If President Trump could read one paragraph of these scribblings, I would wish that he read this last paragraph. Then he might understand, in an instant, who his enemies are – both foreign and domestic. And I say, that enemy is not an opponent, not a competitor, not a business rival. No, no. I mean – an enemy! And once our president can tell friend from foe, his strategic compass will align to true north and half the battle will be won.

END

A second look at Steve Pieczenik’s silent coup and counter-coup announcement raises serious questions

Is Steve Pieczenik a backroom organizer of a “second strategic echelon” of agents who have been prepped by the Left to emerge on the Right?

By Marielena Montesino de Stuart

INTRODUCTION

For those of you who are loyal readers of this blog, you know full well about my support of Donald J. Trump throughout the primary and the general election. In fact, it has been my persistent support of Mr. Trump which has led some readers to part ways with me.  The record of my writing regarding Donald J. Trump’s victorious campaign, including a letter to him regarding his earlier wrong position on Cuba, as well as his positive evolving position against abortion, are all contained in the pages of this blog. 

As a survivor of communism, I have committed my entire life to the dissemination of truth. As such, I am compelled to publish the following observations after taking a second look at Steve Pieczenik’s video containing his November 1 public announcement of a silent coup and counter-coup, as well as some of his other published statements.

In my opinion, Steve Pieczenik at best may be muddying the waters among Donald Trump’s supporters– and at worst, he could cause more harm than good, regardless of his good intentions, at a time when Americans are vulnerable, as they face an election that could change the course of American history. Read on for more details.

|||

On November 1st I received a video from my friend and colleague, Jeff R. Nyquist, an expert and author in the field of geopolitical analysis and international politics. The video contained a public announcement regarding a silent civilian coup and a counter-coup conducted through the internet.

Given the ongoing public leaks regarding the corruption inside various branches of the U.S. government, as well as the Clinton Foundation, Mr. Nyquist and I felt that the video was worthy of attention, particularly because the announcement contained in the video was being delivered by a former high-ranking State Department official, Steve Pieczenik, who has a remarkable professional and academic background.

Here is the text of Pieczenik’s public announcement on November 1, 2016:

On November 1, 2016, Hillary and Bill Clinton and their entourage of assistants effected a civilian coup. In contrast to the usual concept of a coup where the military is involved and takes over the White House and communications and centers, very much like the scenario that you see in a movie, this coup was done silently and very effectively through two methods: corruption and cooptation. The Clintons have been involved in coopting our White House, our Judiciary, our CIA, our Federal Bureau of Investigation, our Attorney General Loretta Lynch and our Director of the FBI, James Comey, for some time now. What they’ve done is to make sure that they were part and parcel of a group of people who are interrelated through political cronyism. However, in order to stop this coup, we, in the intelligence community and others involved have informally gotten together, and with their permission, I am beginning to announce that we have initiated a counter-coup through Julian Assange and Wikileaks.  What has happened in effect when, ah, Comey had to open up the case of Hillary Clinton and discuss the emails that were involved with the Anthony Weiner case. It was not the case itself that was as important as the fact that this was the entrée for many of us in the counter-coup to say to the administration:  we have your number, not only do we have your number, we are going to stop you from making Hillary the President of the United States, and at the same time, we will convict and indict the President of the United States, Loretta Lynch, and many others who are involved in the coverup of the massive corruption that occurred under the Clinton Foundation. Now on both cases, their coup was silent, and our counter-coup was silent, and it was all transgressed or occurred on the internet, and this is probably the first time in the history of any country where a coup was initiated on through the internet, and a counter-coup was initiated through the internet. I am just a small part of something far bigger than myself. It was the brave men and women who were in the FBI, the CIA, the Director of Intelligence, the military intelligence, and men and women in fifteen other intelligence organizations who were sick and tired of seeing this corruption in the White House, in the Justice Department, and in the intelligence system, and we decided that there was something we had to do in order to save the Republic.  So, we initiated a counter-coup through Julian Assange, who’s been very brave and really quite formidable, in his ability to come forth and provide all the necessary emails that we gave to him, in order to undermine Hillary and Bill Clinton. Again America, we’re going through a major, major transition, and quite frankly, a second American Revolution. We do not have guns, we do not have weapons, we do not intend to kill anybody, we do not intend to harm anybody. But we, the American public, and those of us who’ve served in veterans, and in the intelligence service, like myself, will stop the Clintons from assuming power that they don’t deserve. At the same time, we will make certain that Obama leaves without any trail of a pardon, or any other act of treason. In effect, we want a peaceful transition in this great American Republic. I bring you this news, and I want you to understand what has happened. A moment of history is occurring right now in front of us, and I’m proud to explain it to you.”

The trajectory of Pieczenik’s announcement

I have followed the trajectory of the aforementioned video announcement which has gone viral– particularly since it became a headline on Drudge. However, I have also taken a second look at Steve Pieczenik’s announcement vis-à-vis his professional and academic background, as well as some of his other public statements, which have led me to raise some serious questions.  By the time I spoke again to Jeff Nyquist on November 4– he too was raising serious questions regarding the content of Pieczenik’s coup and counter-coup video.

Intelligence gathering and transmission

The nature of intelligence gathering and transmission calls for complete confidentiality, as Pieczenik would know, considering his expertise in this field, notably as Deputy Assistant Secretary of State under Henry Kissinger, Cyrus Vance and James Baker– all three devout globalists. 

Pieczenik’s has an MD in psychiatry and a PhD in international relations. His expertise includes foreign policy, international crisis management and psychological warfare. It is his expertise in psychology and psychological warfare which particularly causes me to seriously question the content of his coup and counter-coup announcement.

Americans, as well as informed people across the world, are aware of the corruption being exposed through Wikileaks, the organization founded by Julian Assange. Anyone who reads the leaked documents understands full well that the individuals leaking the information are working, or are connected in some capacity, with government entities and NGO’s (“non-governmental” organizations) across the world. This is why Wikileaks states on social media, “we open governments.”

Wikileaks operates an effective and powerful civilian-run system of electronic espionage. That being said, the fact that Pieczenik makes the announcement that there are leakers (informants) inside our government is not newsworthy. What is intriguing is that Pieczenik claims, “we, in the intelligence community and others involved, have informally gotten together, and with their permission, I am beginning to announce that we have initiated a counter-coup through Julian Assange and Wikileaks.”

A public announcement about the intelligence community “informally getting together” and giving “permission” to Pieczenik to act as a spokesperson goes against the very nature of espionage. File that under Intelligence 101. In addition, there is nothing, absolutely nothing informal about intelligence gathering and transmission of intelligence.

Consequently, how can someone like Pieczenik with such extensive experience in intelligence and psychological warfare come up with such an announcement?

What exactly is Pieczenik’s objective– other than to present himself publicly as a leaker for Wikileaks, which cannot be corroborated?

This scenario does not help Wikileaks, since I have found that Pieczenik has a trail of opinions which range from controversial to absurd, such as calling the Sandy Hook Elementary School Shooting a “performance” (where Adam Lanza fatally shot 20 young children and several school administrators). I cannot imagine that the intelligence community would interact with someone who makes such statements, regardless of his career in intelligence years ago.

The following is a quote from a commentary published by Steve Pieczenik’s on January 22, 2013 (“The Unbearable Lightness of Sandy Hook’s Mourning”):

Sandy Hook had a REHEARSED, EXCEEDINGLY HISTRIONIC,  SELF-CONSCIOUS element to the whole performance. 

 Lanza –never existed. You know it, I know it.”

For the love of God, the 2nd Amendment can stand strong without the “help” of conspiracy theories, like the one published by Steve Pieczenik.

But let’s get back to Pieczenik’s coup and counter-coup announcement.

On one hand, Pieczenik states that, “we will convict and indict the President of the United States, Loretta Lynch, and many others who are involved in the coverup of the massive corruption that occurred under the Clinton Foundation.” Then, Pieczenik  appears to contradict himself by stating, “we will make certain that Obama leaves without any trail of a pardon, or any other act of treason.”

During the last few days, both Jeff Nyquist and I independently reached similar conclusions:

Pieczenik presents himself as an enemy of the Clinton crime family.  Yet, as is typical of those who worked closely with Henry Kissinger, Pieczenik never uses the word Communist, or the word Russia, in spite of the fact that the Clintons have engaged in nefarious activities with the Russians.

Is Pieczenik trying to divert attention from Russia?

The following is an excerpt from an article published on April 23, 2015 by the New York Times titled, “Cash Flowed to Clinton Foundation Amid Russian Uranium Deal” [bold added for emphasis]:

Beyond mines in Kazakhstan that are among the most lucrative in the world, the sale gave the Russians control of one-fifth of all uranium production capacity in the United States. Since uranium is considered a strategic asset, with implications for national security, the deal had to be approved by a committee composed of representatives from a number of United States government agencies. Among the agencies that eventually signed off was the State Department, then headed by Mr. Clinton’s wife, Hillary Rodham Clinton.

As the Russians gradually assumed control of Uranium One in three separate transactions from 2009 to 2013, Canadian records show, a flow of cash made its way to the Clinton Foundation. Uranium One’s chairman used his family foundation to make four donations totaling $2.35 million. Those contributions were not publicly disclosed by the Clintons, despite an agreement Mrs. Clinton had struck with the Obama White House to publicly identify all donors. Other people with ties to the company made donations as well.”

Pieczenik talks about the Clintons and pedophilia

In a separate video, Pieczenik also brings up the subject of pedophilia and the Clintons. Nyquist, who is an expert on Russia, pointed out that the pedophile game is a KGB strategy adopted in the 1970’s– which the Russians have used to advance the careers of pedophiles in the West, because such people will commit treason without blinking, and they can be blackmailed and bribed. I concur with Nyquist on this, because this perverted technique is used in Cuba. In fact, Cuban government officials and espionage agents are experts at introducing and maintaining this practice. And may I add, the infiltration of pederasty and pedophilia in the Catholic Church erupted after the Second Vatican Council, where Russian Orthodox prelates, who were recalcitrant KGB agents, sat as glorified observers during the Council meetings.

Child trafficking, which is part of pederasty and pedophilia, is actively promoted by the Communists. Again, Cuba is a perfect example of a Communist country where child trafficking is prevalent and goes unpunished, since it is a guarantee of control, not just of government officials, but of an entire sexual tourism industry that benefits Cuba’s Communist government.

In spite of all the well-known information about Russia and the Communist child-trafficking networks and the Clintons connection to Russia, Pieczenik appears to torment the listener with a Clinton connection to child trafficking– but why didn’t Pieczenik, a veteran in the intelligence field, expose this before for the sake of protecting children?

This situation leads to some final observations and questions.

Common ground between the Left and the Right: Steve Pieczenik respects and admires Bernie Sanders

On November 4, Pieczenik published another video titled “US Takeover May be Near” where he says that he’s had  “a lot of respect” for Bernie Sanders. That he saw Sanders give a speech in Warner, New Hampshire and “really admired what he had done.”

Why would Pieczenik admire an intractable socialist Marxist like Bernie Sanders, who admires the Castro government?

I have alerted my readers about the Communist strategy of finding common ground between the Right and the Left. Indeed, during my campaign for the U.S. Senate (on the ballot 2012), as I traveled throughout the State of Florida, I met people who considered themselves conservatives, yet, they saw Vladimir Putin as a harbinger of a new Christian movement. One can excuse such individuals for their lack of understanding of how Communism works to muddy the waters.  But in the case of Steve Pieczenik, I concur with Nyquist in the following question:

Is Steve Pieczenik a backroom organizer of a “second strategic echelon” of agents who have been prepped by the Left to emerge on the Right?

Final words…

As I have written multiple times, our nation is descending violently into a socialist abyss. The Clinton corruption and the disastrous Obama administration are examples of this abyss and what lies ahead.

The best approach to counteract this corruption is to remain informed, to understand how Communism works, to understand what is happening and effect change in your government at a local, state and federal level, to protect the unborn from abortion, to defend the 2nd Amendment (the right to bear arms), to take control of your children’s education and to reject alternatives to traditional marriage of one man and one woman. Add prayer to this, and we will have a chance– with the Grace of God— of putting this country on the right path.

And vote for Donald J. Trump.

Someone has to say the truth…

Copyright © Marielena Montesino de Stuart. All rights reserved.

img_8259

You may contact Marielena HERE
Please click HERE for important copyright terms and conditions, and instructions for quoting excerpts.

Join Marielena's Special List of Readers

Hello readers from Russia!

Thanks for visiting! Drop me a line through my contact form to share your views on the geopolitical and economic situation in Russia, under Vladimir Putin. I would particularly like to hear how you view Putin’s censorship of the press and his ongoing honoring and support of the Castro brothers and their Communist dictatorship in Cuba.

Marielena Montesino de Stuart

Vladimir Putin embracing Raúl Castro, Communist despot in Cuba.

MADNESS: Some Catholics support Vladimir Putin

By Marielena Montesino de Stuart

Click on image or link below to read commentary

Source: MADNESS: Some Catholics support Vladimir Putin | © Marielena Montesino de Stuart. All rights reserved.

“In the current situation…” Russians are sending their long-range bombers

Featured image: Sukhoi Su-34 Russian fighter-bomber with nuclear capability (Photo Vitaly V. Kuzmin, Wikipedia). Photo provided as example only. Aircraft may differ.

 

By Marielena Montesino de Stuart

They are back!

Not since the days of the missile crisis in Cuba have we seen such defiance from the Russians. But these are different times, and nothing, absolutely nothing should surprise us, “in the current situation.”

And what is this “current situation”? Well, for starters, these are the days when America is no longer respected as the leader of the free world—because the definition of a free world has changed.

You see, “in the current situation” everywhere you turn it is evident that international socialism is in control of entire nations– and their populations don’t even know it. This is called “conditioning”—and the socialists at the United Nations have been working hard at it for decades.

Ex-KGB thug, Vladimir Putin, has the United States exactly where he wants it: ambivalent, lacking leadership and submerged in socialist transformation (Sustainable Development). In other words, a distracted player on the world’s stage, no longer leading.

I’m afraid that this “current situation” will continue to have very negative ramifications for our sovereignty and economy.

Russia’s Defense Minister, Sergei Shoigu, has stated that, “In the current situation we have to maintain military presence…” As far as Putin is concerned, “in the current situation” somebody has to be in charge. That’s why he is sending his long-range bombers to the Gulf of Mexico.

Vladimir Putin’s Communist friends, the Castro brothers, will surely lend their support… “in the current situation.”

Someone has to say the truth… (Please share it).

Copyright © Marielena Montesino de Stuart. All rights reserved.

Important related articles by Marielena Montesino de Stuart:

THE RUSSIA PORTFOLIO

|||||||

REFERENCE:

Russian Bombers To Be Sent To Gulf Of Mexico

|||||||

I WELCOME YOUR COMMENTS REGARDING THIS POST:

Russians,Long-Range Bombers, Sergei Shoigu, “In the current situation”,Marielena Montesino de Stuart, Vladimir Putin, America,  United States,  Current Events,  News,  International, Gulf of Mexico, Millennialls.

The innocent little victims of the war in Ukraine

 

Ukraine, Russia, Vladimir Putin, Eastern Ukraine, Marielena Montesino de Stuart, The innocent little victims of the war in Ukraine.

Copyright © Marielena Montesino de Stuart. All rights reserved.

PLEASE NOTE:  Any ads that may appear below are automatically generated by WordPress and are ABSOLUTELY NOT endorsed by this website; however, please do read my related posts, which also appear below.

 

Russia decides Ukraine’s future

Opera House in Kiev, Ukraine

By Marielena Montesino de Stuart

In my commentary titled Ukraine in the Key of G I covered the tragic reality of Ukraine’s future– and the fact that no matter which way it turns, it will have to choose between worse…. and worse.

Ukraine, which finds itself practically defenseless against Russian military intervention, gave up its nuclear arsenal on December 5, 1994 under the Budapest Memorandum on Security Assurances– a political agreement providing security promises to Ukraine, by its signators (Russia, the United States, United Kingdom, China and France– the latter gave weaker individual assurances in separate documents).

This memorandum led Ukraine to believe that it would have protection in case of threats or use of force against its territorial integrity or political independence. But it appears that the Budapest Memorandum has not done a bit of good for Ukraine– considering its loss of Crimea and the lack of strong and decisive action by the European Union and the United States concerning the Russian-backed separatist chaos in eastern Ukraine.

Vladimir Putin sees this weakness from the West as a window to assert his power and determination– and reportedly said “if I want to, I can take Kiev in two weeks.”  The recipient of this brutal message was José Manuel Barroso, President of the European Commission, according to the newspaper La Repubblica in Italy.

Meanwhile, Germany’s Chancellor, Angela Merkel, is described as being infuriata con Putin (furious with Putin)– but apparently not furious enough to take a strong stand against him.  She is not alone. The European Union is too afraid to rock the boat– given its strong economic ties with Russia.

The following entry retweeted by Ukraine’s Ambassador-at-Large, Olexander Scherba, describes the EU’s disastrous reaction to the Ukrainian crisis:

Screen Shot 2014-09-03 at 11.47.23 PM

By the way, Ben Judah, whose Twitter entry appears above as Scherba’s retweet, writes for OpenDemocracy– a website supported by the likes of the Ford Foundation and the Rockefeller Foundation– who are notorious for their support of population control.  If I were Scherba I would be retweeting and quoting someone else. Unfortunately, traditional values and vetting journalists are not priorities at this point for Ukrainian spokespersons, who are desperately seeking to draw attention to the Ukrainian crisis.

Ambassador Scherba laments how Ukraine is being punished for wanting to be part of the European Union, against Russia’s wishes– and how the EU is turning its back on Ukraine. Scherba has stated that the Ukrainian military forces are running out of weapons and are in need of aircraft.

Ukraine was afraid to be part of NATO under President Viktor Yanukovych– so as not to offend Russia’s sensitivities, when Yanukovych aspired to major economic benefits from Russia.

Now Ukraine wants to be a member of NATO– but NATO is not interested– particularly because extending the alliance into Eurasia is considered a geopolitical threat to the economic interests of the United States, the most powerful member.

It looks like the President of Ukraine, Petro Poroschenko, has accepted the fate of his country by not forcefully objecting to Vladimir Putin’s “cease fire regime” proposal. This puts Russia in control of the terms for eastern Ukraine.

How tragic. European socialism is at work– while Russian communism resurfaces through its expansionist agenda.

Will Ukraine ultimately choose neutrality during this “new” Cold War– as Austria and Finland did during the “old” Cold War?

Do you really think the Cold War ever ended?

I don’t.

Someone has to say the truth… (please share it).

… time to read Ukraine in the Key of G.

 

Copyright © Marielena Montesino de Stuart. All rights reserved.

|||||||

Please click HERE for important copyright terms and conditions, and instructions for quoting excerpts.

Click HERE to join Marielena’s Special List of Readers

Angela Merkel, Chancellor of Germany, Current Events, Infuriata con Putin, Vladimir Putin, International, Marielena Montesino de Stuart, News, Russia, Russia decides Ukraine’s future, Ukraine, Ukraine in the Key of G. 

I WELCOME YOUR COMMENTS REGARDING THIS POST:

|||||||

Any adds that appear below are ABSOLUTELY NOT endorsed by this website; however, please do read additional commentaries, which also appear below.

 

FASHION CHOICES AND STRATEGY: The difference between Prime Minister David Cameron and President Barack Obama

Featured photo: 10 Downing Street website of UK Prime Minister

By Marielena Montesino de Stuart

President Barack Obama’s press conference yesterday was an amazing show of lack of initiative, both symbolically and verbally. Obama appeared at the podium in a beige suit, which is used in the business world to blend in and avoid attention. The social media world was exploding with comments about his beige suit.

Embed from Getty Images

Then, Obama went on to say that he still did not have a strategy to deal with ISIS– whom Obama referred to as a Junior Varsity team earlier this year. In the meantime, ISIS is advancing through Iraq and Syria, terrorizing and controlling territories, erasing national borders, executing people en masse and making it practically impossible for aid to reach victims.

On the Russian front, Obama feels that sanctions will take care of Vladimir Putin– but so far, this has not deterred Putin from carving out pieces of Ukraine and swallowing them up.

President Obama essentially left the American people cold.

Today the United Kingdom raised its threat level to severe- and as I write this brief commentary Prime Minister Cameron is holding a press conference.

The first thing one noticed was Cameron’s choice of a dark suit and a dark tie– which in the world of political public perception represents seriousness and power.

Cameron did not have a teleprompter in front of him. Once he got passed the de rigueur “Islam is a religion of peace” statement (has he spoken to the women of Saudi Arabia, etc.,?) Cameron went on to deliver his message with clarity and determination.

Cameron said that the ISIS threat cannot be solved with foreign policy alone, because we are facing violent religious extremism, which is a great and deep threat to the security of Europe and the world, by seeking to establish itself at the edge of the Mediterranean.

Cameron called for a tough, intelligent and comprehensive approach which will involve a generational struggle, and provided examples of the multiple steps that are being taken to keep the British homeland safe, including confiscation of passports, and denial of entry and/or citizenship, to those who present a threat to the British homeland. Cameron stated that he will do whatever it takes to keep the British people safe.

Without question, Prime Minister Cameron’s press conference made President Obama’s press conference look like a Junior Varsity practice session.

Someone has to say the truth…

Copyright © Marielena Montesino de Stuart. All rights reserved.

Use and/or duplication of this material in whole or in part is strictly prohibited, with the exception of one excerpt per article, which must be limited to 50 (fifty) words, provided that full and clear credit is given to Marielena Montesino de Stuart.

The excerpt must include the link to the original content. Please follow additional detailed instructions under tab titled PLEASE NOTE.

Official photo of United Kingdom Prime Minister David Cameron, from 10 Downing Street website.
Official photo of United Kingdom Prime Minister David Cameron, from 10 Downing Street website.

 

Any ads that may appear below are automatically generated by WordPress and are ABSOLUTELY NOT endorsed by this website; however, please do read my related posts, which also appear below.

The attack on Flight 17: Will this act of war be forgotten?

By Marielena Montesino de Stuart

Flight 17: the aftermath

The gruesome photos of dismembered bodies and pieces of fuselage scattered over a 10-mile radius near the Ukrainian-Russian border— is a scene from hell.  It is a rather painful coincidence that this horrific attack took place on the 96th anniversary of another gruesome event: the execution of the Russian Royal family, by the Bolsheviks.

The attack on Flight 17 is an act of war– which, according to reports, appears to have been perpetrated by individuals who had access to, and operational knowledge of a BUK, which is a Russian-made, medium-range surface-to-air missile system.

While the Ukrainians blame the Russians– and the Russians blame the Ukrainians, intelligence reports from the United Kingdom and Washington are pointing the finger at Vladimir Putin and his Russian-backed separatist forces in eastern Ukraine.

Barack Obama’s initial disconnected remarks about the plane’s crash (“it appears to be a tragedy“) were quite disturbing– even to the point of eliciting criticism from the mainstream media.

A similar disconnected tone was also noted in a joint statement by the President of the European Commission and the President of the European Council in Brussels.

Approximately twenty-four hours later, Obama did some image damage control by presenting a much more somber approach, demanding accountability and calling for an in-depth investigation of the attack. The Europeans followed suit.

It should come as no surprise that during this international socialist era, both the United States government and the European Union are looking towards the United Nations for a plan to address the attack on flight 17.

What?

The United Nations?

Yes, the same United Nations which has elected Cuba and Russia to the Human Rights Council– but somehow forgot to include Ukraine.

As expected, Fidel Castro came out in defense of Russia.

Yes, the same United Nations which has Russia and China as permanent members of the United Nations “Security” Council.

Which begs the question: how can anyone expect that the United Nations is going to legitimately assume the role of decision-maker and justice-seeker in the act of war involving Flight 17– when it protects and elevates terrorist communist governments to positions of leadership?

Ah… but you see, the United Nations is the “new leader” of the world– and you have been conditioned to accept this as a “global citizen.”

Interestingly, a few hours before the attack on Flight 17, I had published a brief commentary on a decision made by a Dutch court, declaring the Netherlands liable for the death of 300 Bosniaks in 1995, who were under the protection of Dutch UN peacekeepers.  This court decision brings into question the reliability of the UN “peacekeeping” forces– when it comes to the protection of innocent civilians in war-torn regions.

How does Flight 17 compare with other planes brought down by a missile attack, gunfire or terrorist-related sabotage?

What about the United States?

Gone are the days of the United States lighting the way in times of war.  Washington has been weakened and disfigured by decades of corruption and lack of moral leadership.

While the remains of 298 innocent victims, including 80 children and some of the world’s top scientists in the field of AIDS research, lie dismembered in the remote fields of eastern Ukraine, innocent people all over the world will continue to be put in harms way, as they wait for justice from the bureaucrats in the United Nations.

This is the tragic reality of our times.

May this act of war not be forgotten– and may the passengers and crew members of Flight 17 rest in the peace of Our Lord.

Someone has to say the truth…

Copyright © Marielena Montesino de Stuart. All rights reserved.

IMPORTANT RELATED ARTICLES, BY MARIELENA MONTESINO DE STUART:

“Ukraine in the Key of G”

Vladimir Putin visits Fidel and Raúl Castro: The love affair continues

|||||||

Please click HERE for important copyright terms and conditions, and instructions for quoting excerpts.

Click HERE to join Marielena’s Special List of Readers

|||||||

I WELCOME YOUR COMMENTS REGARDING THIS POST:

 

REFERENCE:

Extensive coverage of attack on Flight 17, by BBC News

Obama goes AWOL again with just 40-second mention of Malaysian plane crash | Mail Online

EUROPA – PRESS RELEASES – Press release – Joint statement by the President of the European Commission, José Manuel Barroso, and the President of the European Council, Herman Van Rompuy, on the crash of the Malaysian airliner in Ukraine

|||||||

Flight 17, Amsterdam-Kuala Lumpur, Ukraine, Russia, Vladimir Putin, European Union, Washington, Act of War, United Nations, News, International, Current Events, Marielena Montesino de Stuart, The attack on Flight 17: Will this act of war be forgotten?.

|||||||

PLEASE NOTE:  Any ads that may appear below are automatically generated by WordPress and are ABSOLUTELY NOT endorsed by this website; however, please do read my related posts, which also appear below.

Vladimir Putin visits Fidel and Raúl Castro: The Love Affair Continues

By Marielena Montesino de Stuart

Old flames never die...

Ahhhh, I’ve missed you Raúl.  I’ve missed you too, Vlad.

As a survivor of Fidel Castro’s murderous Communist dictatorship– and as one who opposes the aggressive and oppressive international agenda of the homosexual collective against those who disagree with homosexual “marriage”–- I am appalled at the level of ignorance from those who are throwing their support behind Putin and his KGB-infested Russian Orthodox Church, as a solution to this catastrophe. These individuals are basing their enthusiasm on Putin’s farcical Christian proclamations of Russia as a moral world leader.  

And for those out there who are running out of excuses– NO, MY CRITICISM OF PUTIN DOES NOT MEAN that Washington and the European Union hold the MORAL high ground. Not at all.

Well, well, well. Surprise. Surprise.

Let’s see what alibi the fans of Vladimir Putin come up with this time. These impressionable and terribly uninformed individuals are falling on their knees, kissing Vladimir Putin’s feet and declaring him their new Christian hero– while Putin kisses communist murderers.

You see, it’s summer time– and the Russians are getting restless for tropical weather, as well as for new financial and military horizons where they can flex their muscles. That is exactly what Vladimir Putin is doing. So he headed straight to Havana– as the first stop in his tour of Latin America.

In Cuba, Putin enjoyed the island breezes, as well as the warm friendship and eternal gratitude of Fidel and Raúl Castro– who are just tickled pink to see their old friend Putin arrive bearing gifts like Santa Claus in the middle of the summer– that is, gifts of pecuniary forgiveness and promises to help finance an adventure down an oil rabbit hole, in Cuba’s coastal waters.

The Telegraph reports [information in brackets added for clarification]:

Mr. Putin laid a wreath at Revolution Square in Havana [Havana’s Memorial to the Soviet Internationalist Soldier] with Raúl Castro, the communist island’s president, and later met for an hour behind closed doors with his older brother Fidel, the long-time former dictator.

The visit was far from ceremonial as Russia agreed to write off 90 per cent of the impoverished island’s $35 billion (£20 billion) debts to Moscow and announced a series of oil and trade initiatives with its ally, a staunch supporter of Mr. Putin during the Ukraine crisis.

Vladimir Putin is playing his devout Christian followers like a drum.

On one hand, Putin claims to oppose homosexuality in Russia and issues proclamations about “Christianity.”  On the other hand, he praises murderous, corrupt communist despots like Fidel and Raúl Castro– whose government pays for homosexual men to have sex-change operations– then incarcerates and tortures them when they dare to complain about government oppression. Is this the fulfillment of Castro’s dream for the creation of a “new man” in his Marxist utopia?

But we, too, have a “new man” in our midst.  The one who has emerged from the pews to support a former KGB thug like Vladimir Putin– who loves and supports Fidel Castro.

Someone has to say the truth…

Copyright © Marielena Montesino de Stuart.  All rights reserved.

Please click HERE for important copyright terms and conditions, and instructions for quoting excerpts.

Click HERE to join Marielena's Special List of Readers

|||||||

IMPORTANT RELATED ARTICLES, BY MARIELENA MONTESINO DE STUART:

CUBA: 55 years of communist terror, erased from history

Ukraine in the Key of G

JOIN ME AND SHARE THIS POST ON:

Vladimir Putin, Russia, Fidel Castro,  Raúl Castro, Cuba, International Socialism,  Communism, Marielena Montesino de Stuart.

|||||||

PLEASE NOTE:  Any ads that may appear below are automatically generated by WordPress and are ABSOLUTELY NOT endorsed by this website; however, please do read my related posts, which also appear below.